View source for Talk:R-Car/Boards/Kingfisher
We have moved Q&A page to Renesas Rulz site.
Please submit a question to new site.
- [View source↑]
|Thread title||Replies||Last modified|
|Yocto Image for H3ULCB+Kingfisher M04||10||08:02, 9 April 2020|
|HDMI DU_DOTCLKOUT frequency on Kingfisher||2||05:23, 28 November 2019|
|How to use Leopard Imaging LI-OV10635-GMSL||3||23:44, 11 September 2019|
|About 60fps Camera for R-car||1||03:32, 22 August 2019|
|USB3 ports not detected on King Fisher||1||01:13, 10 May 2019|
|LVDS Camera driver source code||2||18:52, 19 September 2018|
|HDMI output||2||21:19, 23 April 2018|
|Debug serial I/F||2||21:19, 23 April 2018|
|About 440p_ComExpress CN1B B055||3||17:58, 15 April 2018|
|Kernel image for Kingfisher||2||05:15, 9 March 2018|
|How to connect Starter Kit to Kingfisher and use Starter Kit's JTAG I/F||4||02:55, 5 March 2018|
What is the best way to create a Linux Yocto (preferably 3.21) for the H3ULCB+Kingfisher M04 configuration?
I tried the build instructions from here, but the image doesn't boot: https://elinux.org/R-Car/Boards/Kingfisher#Build_image
During the Kernel startup I get a panic:
[ 1.531217] loop: module loaded
[ 1.537959] renesas-rpc ee200000.rpc0: using DMA read (dma0chan0)
[ 1.544521] Bad mode in Error handler detected on CPU1, code 0xbf000000 -- SError
[ 1.552007] Internal error: Oops - bad mode: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Full details here: http://renesasrulz.com/adas/f/adas---forum-1845141225/15725/boot-failure-on-renesas-h3ulcb-kingfisher-board-based-on-r8a7795-es2-0/51386#51386
How can I build a Image which supports the Kingfisher features (especially 8ch. audio and USB3.0): https://elinux.org/R-Car/Boards/Kingfisher#S.2FW_support_status
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:
- The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
- You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.
You can view and copy the source of this page.
Return to Thread:Talk:R-Car/Boards/Kingfisher/Yocto Image for H3ULCB+Kingfisher M04/reply.
Thanks for your help!
I have to admit that the boot log from the link above is not mine (just the error was the same).
My u-boot and IPL is newer, here is my full log of the kernel Oops: https://pastebin.com/wiXmDzxz
It is a dual-boot system which can also boot Android (for development), so the bootloader is from the Android build. I hope that's not the problem?
Here is my u-boot environment: https://pastebin.com/qqw8cJJS
Sorry, I have never used android on H3ULCB + KF.
But, I tested Yocto v3.21.0 on H3ULCB(ES2.0 4GB) + KF(M04) again.
And I confirmed that it works.
How about using yocto bootloader ?
if yocto can be booted, android bootloder may not be good for yocto...
Thanks for your help Y.H. With the Yocto-Firmware it boots as expected.
How I need to get the Android part working again, but boota is not supported in the Yocto's u-boot. But that's a different story now.
I prepared android 9 for H3ULCB(ES2.0 4GB) + KF(M4), and tested for booting yocto.
In my environment, yocto was booted with android's IPL and U-boot.
If you use old version of android, how about updating it ?
What is the maximum supported frequency for DU_DOTCLKOUT on Kingfisher (not ULCB)? Need to understand limitations of "SoC's DU (digital RGB out) -> ADV7513 (HDMI)" pipeline. According to chapter "4.13. HDMI" of http://www.shimafuji.co.jp/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/SBEV-RCAR-KF-M05Board_HWSpecificationENRev120.pdf maximum supported resolution is 1920x1080i. But this manual does not tell maximum framerate and so maximum supported frequency is not clear.
The maximum frequency of Kingfisher is 100MHz(DOTCLKOUT: Min 10ns).
I am trying to use Leopard Imaging LI-OV10635-GMSL with Kingfisher.
Is there a difference in BSP build procedure for LI-OV10635-GMSL and RDACM21?
Is there any difference in handling on Linux?
Please add the following to bootargs when linux starts up. ov106xx.dvp_order=0
I'm looking for 60fps Camera for R-Car.
Because IMI camera RDACM21 is discontinued.
So, Can you please give me information about 60fps Camera that has been used successfully for R-car Kingfisher.
The following cameras are currently supported: https://elinux.org/R-Car/Boards/Kingfisher#Connection-confirmed_Hardware_information
Development will continue, but the schedule is undecided. Please check the eLinux site regularly.
Linux does not detect the RCAR M3 USB3 ports.
m3ulcb login: root Last login: Tue Apr 23 11:47:22 UTC 2019 on tty2 root@m3ulcb:~# lsusb Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
U-Boot 2015.04 (Oct 17 2016 - 14:46:11)
The following is the Yocto Build Configuration
Build Configuration: BB_VERSION = "1.36.0" BUILD_SYS = "i686-linux" NATIVELSBSTRING = "universal" TARGET_SYS = "aarch64-poky-linux" MACHINE = "m3ulcb" DISTRO = "poky" DISTRO_VERSION = "2.4.2" TUNE_FEATURES = "aarch64 cortexa57-cortexa53" TARGET_FPU = "" SOC_FAMILY = "rcar-gen3:r8a7796" meta meta-poky meta-yocto-bsp = "tmp:342fbd6a3e57021c8e28b124b3adb241936f3d9d" meta-rcar-gen3 = "tmp:fd078b6ece537d986852cb827bd21e022a797b2f" meta-optee = "tmp:75dfb67bbb14a70cd47afda9726e2e1c76731885" meta-oe = "tmp:dacfa2b1920e285531bec55cd2f08743390aaf57" meta-rcar-gen3-adas = "v3.9.0:c9fe17a631ea887fd682e3071e5cf62be8f021ef"
Kind Regards, Declan
Is there LVDS camera driver source code available?
If any, please let me know the source code file path?
Is Kingfisher's HDMI output terminal CN49 ?
Can I use StarterKit's CN4 (HDMI mini) ?
Is Kingfisher's debug serial I/F CN4 ?
Can I use StarterKit's CN12 ?
I am investigating the connection relationship between Kingfisher (* 1) and StarterKit (* 2).
(* 1), B055 of 440p_ComExpress is named IrqEXT0xE8 and it is connected with INT of U11 (TCA9539QPWRQ1).
(* 2), B055 of 440p_ComExpress is named AVB_AVTP_MATCH / SCL5 and is connected to B11 (AVB_AVTP_MATCH_A) of R-Car SiP.
How will it work (how do you communicate) with B055 when connecting (* 1) and (* 2) together?
440p_ComExpress CN1B B055
440p_ComExpress CN1B B055
When Kingfisher upgraded from M04 to M05, it seems that the connection has changed from A079 to B055, so I am investigating the reason.
440p_ComExpress B055 is an output terminal (INT output of IO Expander) for Kingfisher.
Even for StarterKit I think that it is an output terminal (AVB_AVTP_MATCH output of R - CarGen 3).
Therefore, I think that the outputs collide with each other.
Is my understanding wrong?
Is the procedure shown in https://elinux.org/R-Car/Boards/Kingfisher#Build_image for SBEV-RCAR-KF-M04 or for the latest version of SBEV-RCAR-KF-M05?
I've never seen SBEV-RCAR-KF-M05 board. I'll check if I get the board.Do you have it?
I also do not have the SBEV-RCAR-KF-M05 board as well.
I am worried about whether the Linux build procedure differs between SBEV-RCAR-KF-M04 and SBEV-RCAR-KF-M05.
If it is different, could you show it?
I have an SBEV-RCAR-KF-M04 board and I was planning to setup it from now.
I am using Kingfisher (SBEV-RCAR-KF-M04(Advanced Model)).
With Starter Kit connected to M04, Kingfisher manufacturer taught that Starter Kit's JTAG I/F can not be used.
However, by correcting the circuit on Starter Kit side, he taught him that Starter Kit's JTAG I/F can be used even when Starter Kit is connected to M04.
Please tell me about Starter Kit circuit correction contents necessary to use Starter Kit's JTAG I/F with Starter Kit connected to M04.
I think the problem is that the TMS_18 signal is connected to GND. As one method, cutting the signal of SK seems to be able to avoid the problem. However, I think that it is very difficult to cut short distances from other signals(for me at least).
Anyway, please give me time to cut and confirm.
Thank you for your response.
I will consider the correspondence.
I cut the signal of SK. Please refer to the picture on the back side of SK.
Then, I connected SK and M04 KF and confirmed that JTAG started up.
Note: Cutting the signal is very difficult. I can not recommend it.